Lung cancer screening: the cost of inaction

Improving early detection of lung cancer via targeted screening has the potential to drastically reduce the burden of the world’s leading cause of cancer deaths.

Lung cancer screening: the cost of inaction

Context

Lung cancer accounts for the greatest public health and economic burden of all cancers. Across the world, it is responsible for one in every five cancer deaths. Earlier detection of lung cancer could significantly reduce this burden, transforming it from a fatal condition to one that is treatable.

Prognosis for lung cancer is poor compared with most other cancers. This is largely because many cases are detected at an advanced stage, when treatment options are limited. Five-year survival for stage I lung cancer can be as high as 68–92%, but only around one fifth of people with lung cancer are diagnosed at this stage. More than twice as many people receive their diagnosis as stage IV, when their likelihood of surviving five years is less than 10%.

Shifting diagnosis of lung cancer to an earlier stage could thus lead to a substantial reduction in the number of deaths from lung cancer. This would, in turn, dramatically reduce the economic toll of cancer on our societies. The most effective way to achieve such a shift is via targeted screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT).

Trials have shown that LDCT screening has the potential to reduce lung cancer deaths among high-risk individuals by almost a quarter. In light of this evidence, the time has come for governments to consider implementation of targeted lung cancer screening. Experts suggest it compares favourably with other cancer screening programmes in terms of cost-effectiveness. Moreover, its benefits extend beyond lung cancer, as targeted LDCT screening also has the potential to detect other non-communicable diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Investing in early detection of lung cancer is also an investment in the future sustainability of our health systems and post-pandemic recovery.

What we’ve achieved

HPP developed a report exploring the cost of not implementing lung cancer screening. The report was written on behalf of the Lung Ambition Alliance, a global partnership among AstraZeneca, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Guardant Health and the Global Lung Cancer Coalition.

The report is based on a review of the international literature, including implementation research from several countries. It considers the public health and economic benefits of earlier detection of lung cancer and sets out key factors in the successful implementation of a targeted screening programme.

Lung cancer screening: the cost of inaction was published in July 2021 as part of the Lung Ambition Alliance’s work to achieve its ambition to eliminate lung cancer as a cause of death, starting with doubling five-year survival by 2025.

We also produced a toolkit for the Lung Ambition Alliance’s funders, to help them adapt the content of the report within their national contexts.

We later adapted the research to Latin America, producing a report in English, Portuguese and Spanish.

Key partners and stakeholders

The initial report was developed by HPP for the Lung Ambition Alliance, and was endorsed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

The Latin American adaptation was commissioned by AstraZeneca and was not developed on behalf of the Lung Ambition Alliance.

Project funding

This project was initiated and funded by AstraZeneca, a founding partner of the Lung Ambition Alliance.

Share
Cookie Settings
The Health Policy Partnership

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

The Health Policy Partnership. Developing credible resources to help inform policymakers about key health issues across the globe. A range of international healthcare policy change research topics including; Person-centred care, NASH, BRCA, etc. International healthcare policy research and policy change consultants.

Essential Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features. These must be enabled at all times, so that we can save your preferences.

 

The Health Policy Partnership. Developing credible resources to help inform policymakers about key health issues across the globe. A range of international healthcare policy change research topics including; Person-centred care, NASH, BRCA, etc. The Health Policy Partnership. Developing credible resources to help inform policymakers about key health issues across the globe. A range of international healthcare policy change research topics including; Person-centred care, NASH, BRCA, etc. International healthcare policy research and policy change consultants.

3rd Party Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.